[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: [ubl] Extension
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Grimley Michael J NPRI [mailto:GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil]
Sendt: 30. maj 2006 20:51
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc: David Kruppke; allem@wmdata.com; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: RE: [ubl] ExtensionPeter,You seem to have an object ('ID') with an apparent property term of 'ID' defined as NameType; is this correct?Thank You,Mike
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 1013
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: David Kruppke; allem@wmdata.com
Subject: [ubl] ExtensionDear TC
I talked to David Kruppke from Gefeg and agreed that Extension [0..1] is handled as a NDR issue - an element generated from GEFEC FX in stead being specified in each document.
This is the definition of extension we agreed on at the Brussel meeting.
ID [0..1] (name type)
Name [0..1] (name type)
AgencyID [0..1] (ID type)
AgencyName [0..1] (Name type)
VersionID [0..1] (ID type)
AgencyURI [0..1] (ID type)
URI [0..1] (ID type)
ExtensionReasonCode [1..1] (Code type)
ExtensionReason [0..1] (text type)
ExtensionContentAny [1..1] (xsd: any)
kind regards
Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]