[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Sanity check for models dated 20100618-2010z
The next issue I find is with the schemas ... here is an excerpt from UBL-CommonAggregateComponents-2.1.xsd: <xsd:element name="TransportAdvisorParty" type="PartyType"/> <xsd:element name="TransportContract" type="TransportContractType"/> <xsd:element name="TransportContract" type="ContractType"/> <xsd:element name="TransportEquipment" type="TransportEquipmentType"/> ... and note the two declarations for "TransportContract" (of course there can only be one). . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken At 2010-06-19 07:51 -0400, I wrote: >At 2010-06-15 18:34 +0200, Arianna Brutti wrote: >>I have completed my tasks. >> >>I have some doubts about two tasks, but this morning I asked Tim a >>clarification about. If some changes concerning this will be >>needed, I will be able to make them later. >> >>So, if you agree, I think that we have reached a good point to try >>to generate a new snapshot of draft UBL 2.1 models and to >>automatically check if all problems related to DEN, data type >>qualification, ... have been resolved. > >Thank you for your efforts Arianna! > >Please find below my latest analysis, this one from >20100618-2010z. Note that the old missing data type qualification >is *not* an error ... this is acceptable. All such are being >reported in case there are others that are missed, but this one was >a conscious decision. > >. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01 Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/ Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]