[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: VS: [ubl] Agenda for Pacific UBL TC call 12 July 2010
At 2010-07-14 18:28 +0200, Arianna Brutti wrote: >I am going to wait for your decision; We have decided moments ago during the UBL TC teleconference to accept that UBL 2.1 will have repaired dictionary entry names that are changed from UBL 2.0 provided that such changes do not change the UBL Name that is automatically constructed from the dictionary entry name. >then I think that information you provided me should be enough to >complete the required changes ... otherwise I will ask you for helping :-) Please do! >Hoping to help you in deciding, I would like to remember you as follows: > >a lot of changes from UBL 2.0 from UBL 2.1 reported below should be >due to inconsisten naming components problems; for example: > >all xxx. Sales Order Identifier. Identifier are old= 0..1 new= > >because we decided to allign them to the UBL 2.0 Line Item. Sales_ >Order Identifier. Idetifier > >(see mail from Tim ><http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201005/msg00018.html>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201005/msg00018.html) Yes, I now accept that UBL 2.1 will have different dictionary entry names for some UBL 2.0 constructs. A list of these repairs will be included in the UBL 2.1 documentation. Thank you for your efforts to complete the changes in the models. I look forward to obtaining your final work for testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01 Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/ Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]