[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 23 May 2011
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING MONDAY 23 MAY 2011 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Andy Schoka STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ubl.xml.org/events None. Review of Atlantic call minutes No comments. UBL 2.1 PRD2 STATUS An initial draft has been posted: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/document.php?document_id=42253 JB: We are expecting the missing ASN.1 files in time to produce a candidate PRD2 by Wednesday and hope to begin a vote soon thereafter. AS: Partial comments on the initial draft: For correction in PRD2: In 2.14: Need an explicit reference to Figure 55. The order of subsections in 2.14 should be the same as in Figure 55 (Forwarding Instructions, Packing List, Bill of Lading, Waybill). There should be a forward reference in 2.14 to Transportation Status (shown in Figure 55 but not mentioned till section 2.16). The last sentence of 2.14.3 [Waybill] should read "between a transport service buyer and a transport service provider" (NOT transport service seller). The entry for Transport Progress Status in 2.18 should read "giving a status on the transport means" (not transport STATUS). For disposition in PRD3: In 2.15, the first paragraph doesn't mention air; is this intentional? ACTION: AS to ask Audun. Figures 57 and 59 are lacking labels for source and destination, and in Figure 59, "TU" and "TSP" need to be spelled out. ACTION: AS to ask Audun for revisions. In section 2.15.5, the name "Transport Progress Status" needs further discussion. The language in 2.16 needs to reflect a federated distribution of status (not just the freight forwarder). The entry for Certificate of Origin in 2.18 needs to amplify the difference between the UBL COO document type and an actual COO. The current description does not explain this. The entry for Transportation Status in 2.18 needs to reflect the federated distribution of status. The third paragraph in 2.19 mentions "qualifying party," but no such entry appears on the following table; also, there is no mention of the party whose role is Transportation Network Manager or Transport Regulator. AS will have further comments when he finishes his review. TC CONCALL SCHEDULE Week of 2011.05.23 Regular schedule Week of 2011.05.30 >>> MEETING IN STOCKHOLM <<< Week of 2011.06.06 Regular schedule For June and July: looking like our regular call schedule; discuss in this week's Atlantic call. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]