[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Quality assurance on use of Oxford English (and finding other problems)
At 2011-11-29 17:18 +0100, Arianna Brutti wrote:
I started to implement the prd3 issues and I took the chance to correct the "Bad dictionary entry names" you reported.
Well done!
I have not yet addressed the errors in the definitions; they needed more time and may be they can be automatically corrected in eDoCreator. In any case, now I know that the definitions need to be reviewed; I am going to discuss with psc and tsc and look for the best way to address this point.
Good. My guess is that the missing apostrophes are a result of eDoCreator importing the original stylesheets. While I cannot confirm this, I can imagine that the spreadsheet program originally encoded the apostrophe with a Unicode "smart right quote" character, rather than the ASCII ' character. During importation this character was probably translated into a single space since it wasn't an ASCII character.
For portability, I believe we should use the ASCII ' character for the apostrophe, just as we should use the ASCII " character for the double quote.
Thank you for looking into these issues. Please let me know if you can think of any other automated checks I can add to the model checker.
. . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour video lecture: XSLT/XPath 1.0 & 2.0 http://ude.my/t37DVX Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]