[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Incorporated definitions for UBL 2.1 review
A quick review of these revised links suggests that my problem is now gone, but the subcommittee issue of the definition file is still unaddressed.
At 2013-01-06 23:39 -0500, I wrote:
Except for the problems identified below, you can find the draft of the proposed UBL 2.1 definitions for all models here:... ... or for PSC models only here: ... ... or for TSC models only here: ...
Please use the following links for the definition review of all models: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47829/#Summary ... or for PSC models only here: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47830/#Summary ... or for TSC models only here: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47831/#SummaryPlease forgive my oversight in the files of the earlier post. This underscores the importance of committee members reviewing the artefacts I'm creating for any faults.
As for the subcommittee oversight, check this out: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47829/#t-CommonLibrary-781 Definition: "New definition is OK"
At 2012-12-19 11:14 -0500, I wrote:UBL 2.1 PRD3 DEFINITION REVIEW Status of PSC definition review Proposed definitions are posted: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-psc/201212/msg00001.html Peter - would members please review column J of new definitions for the proper use of English and grammar? Status of TSC definition review Proposed definitions are posted: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-tsc/201212/msg00011.html
Looking at the PSC definition file, row 771 does, indeed, have "New definition is OK" in column "J" as the new definition.
I cannot programmatically check for incorrectly written new definitions, thus my process is incorporating column "J" as the process was defined by Jon. When "J" is empty I use "D", unless it is empty, in which case the original definition is unchanged (though it is confirmed as not having been changed in the database).
I do not have the time to produce all these artefacts and check that subcommittee submissions follow the guidelines.
I ask that PSC review their definitions file and resubmit it when it has been checked. Although I haven't come across any problems with the TSC definitions, it might help just to do a quick review, please, for any problems that may lie hidden there.
Thank you! . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]