[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-138) bringing UBL "billing" documents in sync
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kees Duvekot updated UBL-138: ----------------------------- Component/s: Documents and business objects > bringing UBL "billing" documents in sync > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: UBL-138 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-138 > Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documents and business objects > Reporter: Kees Duvekot > Assignee: Ken Holman > > All, > > As part of the analysis of tickets UBL-44, UBL-60 and UBL-137 I have looked at all the billing documents in UBL and see where they are “not in sync” with each other. > > I have looked at the following billing documents: > > Invoice > CreditNote > SelfBilledInvoice > SelfBilledCreditNote > FreightInvoice > > I have done a comparison of the various UBL elements that are in these documents on “header level”. > > This is the result: > > cbc:DueDate > This is only available in Invoice, and not in the other documents. > As part of bringing all billing documents in sync I would propose to add this the the 4 other billing documents (preferably at the same “position” as invoice) > > cbc:InvoiceTypeCode / cbc:CreditNoteTypeCode > In all documents except SelfBilledCreditNote there is a “TypeCode” element. > I would propose to add the cbc:CreditNoteTypeCode to the SelfBilledCreditNote to bring it in line with the normal CreditNote Document. > > cbc:BuyerReference > This element is available in Invoice and CreditNote, but not in the SelfBilled equivalents. > I would propose to add this to both SelfBilledInvoice and SelfBilledCreditNote > I would NOT include It in the FreightInvoice to avoid confusion about “Buyer” in the FreightInvoice context. > > cac:DiscrepancyResponse > This element is available in both the CreditNote and SelfBilledCreditNote, not in the other documents > I would propose to leave this .. because this is a specific element that is only relevant in the CreditNote context as far as I can tell. > > cac:Shipment > This element is only available in the FreightInvoice, and is the only real element that is different with a “normal” invoice. > I would NOT add this to the other documents to keep the separate status of FreightInvoice. > > cac:StatementDocumentReference > This element is missing from the FreightInvoice. > As far as I can tell the statements can not be used for “Freight” purpuses .. so not having this on the FreightInvoice makes sense > > cac:ProjectReference > This element is only available in the Invoice, not in the other 4 billing documents. > I would propose to add this element also to all the other billing documents. > > cac:BuyerCustomerParty / cac:SellerSupplierParty > These two element are not available in the FreightInvoice > It makes sense that they are NOT in the freightInvoice, but what would be the equivalants for Freight? Based on TransportExecutionPlan(Request)Type I would think TransportUserParty / TransportServiceProviderParty but I would leave that discussion for 2.3 > > cac:Delivery / cac:DeliveryTerms > These elements are not available in the FreighInvoice > I would NOT add them to FreightInvoice, as that they are really “Ordering” related > > cac:PrepaidPayment > This element is not available in the CreditNote and SelfBilledCreditNote > But it makes sense that it is NOT there, because prepaying your credit … that does not make sense at all > > cac:WithholdingTaxTotal > This element is only available in the Invoice not in the other documents > I would propose that we also add this to all the other elements to bring the WithHoldingTax handling on all documents in line with each other. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]