[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Further Errata - "Using WSDL in a UDDI Registry, v2" TN
Luc,
I would much rather remove the basic definitions of the tModels from the TN. Once the tModels are in the UDDI Business Registry then I regard that as the normative source.
John Colgrave IBM
-----Original Message-----
John,
In addition to the issues noted at [1] I've found other issues with the TN that need to be addressed for the TN to be consistent with the tModels to be published shortly to the IBM UBR node.
These are as follows:
1. many tModels are missing the "description" element in the XML rendering of the tModel's structure (e.g. B.3.2.1 V2 tModel Structure).
2. the (B.9) WSDL Address tModel tModel definition's "description" element does not match what is provided in Section B.9.2.1 V2 tModel Structure; I suggest that the text of B.9.2 be used for the description element of section B.9.2.1.
3. there is inconsistent use of keyName attributes: some use "types" as the string and others are missing the keyName. In the attached, I've updated the tModels to use "uddi-org:types" as the keyName value and have added missing keynames.
Could you please update all tModels in the TN so they match the attached? Note also that there are some outstanding issues wrt to my post at [1] which will need to be resolved.
Thanks, Luc
Luc Clément Secretary, OASIS UDDI Spec TC
Web: www.iclement.net/luc MSN IM: luclclement@hotmail.com Cell: 425.941.0150
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]