uddi-spec message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Groups - uddi-spec-tc-cr083-multiversioning inconsistency-20040809.doc uploaded
- From: "Luc Clement" <luc.clement@systinet.com>
- To: "'John Colgrave'" <colgrave@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:23:39 -0700
Why
don't I take a stab at revised text after the telecon.
Luc,
By definition, a value set with entity keys as valid
values is represented by a tModel categorised using the entityKeyValues category
system. If you prefer to describe the behaviour in terms of the concrete
representation then change the section heading to be something about tModels
categorised using the entityKeyValues category system.
Regards,
John
--------------------------------------------------
John
Colgrave
Architect, IBM WebSphere UDDI Registry
"Luc Clement" <luc.clement@systinet.com> wrote on 10/08/2004
16:02:04:
> John, I disagree with the statement "I don't think it is
necessary
> to say that the behaviour applies to tModels categorised
using the
> entityKeyValues category system as the entire section is
about value
> sets with entity keys as valid values, and the two things
are equivalent."
>
> This section of the spec simply does not make it
explicit that this
> applies to keyedReferences whose tModel is
categorized using
> entityKeyValues; one has to imply this from the
heading and from the
> "See section...".
>
> We might argue over
the text but I definitively think that
> clarifying this behaviour is
necessary.
>
> Luc
>
>
> From: John Colgrave
[mailto:colgrave@uk.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004
07:49
> To: mirek.novotny@systinet.com
> Cc:
uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [uddi-spec] Groups -
uddi-spec-tc-cr083-multiversioning
> inconsistency-20040809.doc
uploaded
>
> The sentence you seem
to have trouble with is English (at least
> British English, it may not
be American English). The meaning of
> the sentence is (was
intended to be) "Entity keys when used as
> keyValue values with value
sets that use entity keys as valid values
> must be mapped in the same way
that entity keys are mapped in all
> other places that they occur."
>
> I think the proposed replacement sentence is less accurate.
It
> assumes that a V3 key is supplied, and therefore does not make
sense
> in the example in the following paragraph.
>
> I
don't think it is necessary to say that the behaviour applies to
>
tModels categorised using the entityKeyValues category system as the
>
entire section is about value sets with entity keys as valid values,
> and
the two things are equivalent.
>
> Regards,
>
>
John
> --------------------------------------------------
> John
Colgrave
> Architect, IBM WebSphere UDDI Registry
> Telephone/FAX:
+44 (0)1962 816887
>
> mirek.novotny@systinet.com wrote on
10/08/2004 14:52:17:
>
> > The document
uddi-spec-tc-cr083-multiversioning
> > inconsistency-20040809.doc has
been submitted by Mirek Novotny
> > (mirek.novotny@systinet.com) to
the OASIS UDDI Specification TC
> > document repository.
> >
> > Document Description:
> > Conversion to v2 key format of
keyValues of entityKeyValue-based
> > keyedReferences
> >
> > Download Document:
> >
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/download.
> >
php/8642/uddi-spec-tc-cr083-multiversioning%20inconsistency-20040809.doc
>
>
> > View Document Details:
> >
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/document.php?
>
> document_id=8642
> >
> >
> > PLEASE NOTE:
If the above links do not work for you, your email application
>
> may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copyand
paste
> > the entire link address into the address field of your web
browser.
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe
from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> > roster of the
OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.
> >
org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> >
smime.p7s
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]