[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: workprocess - default process comments
One other item, the requirement to justify a negative vote. I was victimized by this requirement in Rosetta Net, and deplore it. While the reason for the ISO requirement that Jon related is fine - gather items for the next revision - it doesn't apply to all cases (as when there's been a long discussion already on the record, with good documentation, or when someone votes no on some general ground). In RN, the requirement was to document your negative vote in only a few working days. This was burdensome when I had a tight schedule already, and I felt it deterred people from voting no. I would prefer to *allow* justification of a negative vote, for the record and for consideration in future revisions, but not to *require* it. regards, Terry
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC