[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Fast track, slow track
Oh yeah, I forgot this one: 070. To what extent can a TC revise its requirements list? And in a few minutes I will also be sending out the following: 010. Voting membership in a committee 011. Why individuals? 012. Criteria for voting membership So our current revised issues list looks like this (the asterisks indicate the issues on which I have already posted or am about to post discussion starters): 000. Need for a new set of procedures * 001. Why Robert's won't work * 002. Why IETF rules won't work, either * 010. Voting membership in a committee * 011. Why individuals? * 012. Criteria for voting membership 020. Limiting debate [021. Rules of discourse in general] 025. Previous Question 030. Notification 040. Public vs. private 050. Standing committees 055. Maintenance commmittees 060. Other committees 061. Joint subcommittees 062. Charter committees 063. Industry harmonization committees 064. Coordination committees 065. Translation committees 070. To what extent can a TC revise its requirements list? 080. Can we call the last step a "standard"? 090. Shall we require agendas in advance of committee meetings?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC