[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 207] New: Justification and tutorial inappropriate
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=207 Summary: Justification and tutorial inappropriate Product: WS-CF Version: 1.0 Platform: PC URL: http://www.choreology.com/external/ws- cf.choreology_comments.htm#CHCF-49 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Text and diagrams AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org ReportedBy: tony.fletcher@choreology.com QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com Where: General Much of the text is material justifying the utility of transactions or coordination, or tutorial material that refers only to particular kinds of coordination (such as classic transaction systems). This perversely obscures what normative requirements are made and functions supported by the WS-CF spec and should not be in the main body of the document (if in it at all). The different explanations of how the concepts and players relate to each other sometimes contradict as well (particular cases have been mentioned in other issues) Suggestion: Describe (once) the model of how activity/context, coordinator, participant, Coordinator Service etc. relate to each other. Remove any text that refers to transaction systems as if they were normative elements of WS-CF implementations. (Consider updating the Primer.) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]