[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names
+1 to preserving the names as they are. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 "Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:15:29 AM: > Title: Document Names > Description: Should the ?names? of the normative documents remain the same as the submission > documents or should they be changed? This issue applies to both WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-RM Policy. > Justification: The ?name? of a document effects a number of things such as the document > identifier, URIs etc. > Target: core, policy > Type: editorial > Proposal: Preserve the name of the documents as submitted. Changing the names would increase > confusion (already at a high level) around ?OASIS and RM? and result in extra effort. There does > not seem to be any reasons for changing the names forcefull enough to override these concerns. > Therefore the names of the normative documents should be ?Web Services Reliable Messaging Protocol > (WS-ReliableMessaging)? and ?Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion (WS-RM Policy)?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]