[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
Sanjay, With regards to these issues, I think that we should first focus on the requirements and usage scenarios rather than discuss any specifics as to how we might address them. I think I made this point on the last call. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 "Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> wrote on 07/18/2005 03:18:10 PM: > > > i006 Source based delivery QoS policy assertion > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/Re > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i006 > Please see Tom's posting on 7/14 for use cases and motivations: > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200507/msg00108.html > > i008 Policy assertions granularity > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/Re > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i008 > > i009 Declaration of QoS policies > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/Re > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i009 > > On the 7/14 conf-call, Tom kindly agreed to own the issue i006. He also > posted a set of use cases and motivation summary on 7/14 (before the > conf call - see link above). Please check this and other relevant email > discussion before the next conf-call. > > The above listed issues seem to be interrelated. It will be great to > have someone first present to the TC a wider context that highlights the > interrelationships, based on which we can set an order for discussing > these issues and avoid going in circles. Any volunteers? > > Thanks, > Sanjay
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]