[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: Definition for "Reliable Message"
Title: Definition for "Reliable
Message" Description: there are
several references to "reliable message" (section 1, 2 intro, 2.1,
2.3) that are not backed by a clear definition. Justification: Terminology
section is defining key concepts, yet does not explain what a reliable message
is (and now other definitions are also referencing "reliable message").
The main requirement of inclusion of a wsrm:Sequence element which could back
an intuitive definition, is not currently related to this expression at all, (related
to DA instead) which is confusing. Target: core Type: editorial Proposal: 1- Add a terminology entry.
It could be: Reliable message: a message
submitted by the Application Source to an RM Source via the "Send"
operation, for transmission over the
protocol defined in this specification. 2- In 3.1: associate
the main protocol requirement (Sequence element) with the definition of "reliable
message" instead of with a vague requirement of being subject to some DA: Replace: "Messages for which the
delivery assurance applies MUST contain a <wsrm:Sequence>
header block." With: "Reliable Messages MUST
contain a <wsrm:Sequence> header
block." (DA and protocol being in fact separately defined, DA should
now more abstractly mandate the use of "reliable messages" if we still
want to pre-req one to the other.) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]