[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue PR023: It should be more clear as to which token is used bya protection assertion
PR023 From: Tony Gullotta
[mailto:tony.gullotta@soa.com] PLEASE DO NOT REPLY
TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSION THREAD UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A
NUMBER. The issues
coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred. Protocol: ws-sp
Artifact: spec Type:
editorial Title:
It should be more clear as to which token is used by a protection assertion Description: On the 2/13 call
there was some debate about whether or not the tokens identified in a binding
assertion would be used for SignedParts, SignedElements, EncryptedParts,
EncryptedElements assertions attached to a message. As there is no other place
to specify the tokens to use for these assertions (as opposed to supporting
tokens assertions that embed these assertions directly), it should be very
clear that the binding assertion must be used. Related issues: Proposed Resolution: Add to the text inthe
binding assertion section or the SignedParts, SignedElements, EncryptedParts,
EncryptedElements assertions sections to make the connection more obvious. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]