I don’t agree with all of these. I propose closing the first to items with no action and adopting the proposals for items 3 -5.
Inline below to make sure I’m clear..
_____________________________________________
From: Greg Carpenter
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:16 AM
To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Issue PR027: Editorial comments on WS-SecurityPolicy Public Review document
Protocol: ws-securitypolicy
Artifact: spec / schema
Type: editorial
Title:
Description: Editorial comments on WS-SecurityPolicy Public Review document
Multiple sections, lines 456, 505,536, 586, 613
Difficult to parse.
Proposal: Replace "binding specific" with "binding-specific"
MG: I don’t see how this adds any additional clarity. I propose retaining the existing text for these instances.
multiple sections, lines 730, 734:
intended use outside the scope of this specification is immaterial
Proposal: replace "is intended to be used" with "may be used"
MG: I think it makes more sense to state the intended use than to not to. I propose retaining the existing text.
section 5.2.2 -- line 733:
verb usage
Proposal: Replace "points" with "pointing"
MG: +1
section 5.4.11 -- line 1552 :
plural agreement
Proposal: Replace "by another specifications" with "in other specifications"
MG: +1
section 8.6 -- line 2460 :
only modifies when, not used
Proposal: Replace "only used when" with "used only when"
MG: +1
Related issues:
None.
Proposed Resolution:
See Description