[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy reference description
>Ian Robinson wrote: Monica, >The TC has committed (through charter clarification) to issue an updated >version of the TX specs with normative references to WS-Policy 1.5 once >the latter becomes a REC. The TX 1.1 specs refers to WS-Policy 1.2. I >believe Ram's issue is simply to clarify that the TX 1.1 reference is >specifically to WS-Policy 1.2 rather than the earlier Sep 2004 draft of >WS-Policy (somethines referred to as WS-Policy 1.1) which is also >referenced by the RDDL document at >http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/. > >Regards, >Ian Robinson > > mm1: I understand that Ian and thanks. My point is you have the same condition by referencing the W3C WS-Policy submission with a version 1.2 within a standards organization. Reference: 1. The charter for the W3C WS-Policy WG: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/06/ 2. The member submission: http://www.w3.org/Submission/WS-Policy/ and http://www.w3.org/Submission/WS-PolicyAttachment/ Thanks. >"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM> >Sent by: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM >25/04/2007 23:17 > >To >Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com> >cc >"'Ram Jeyaraman'" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>, >ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject >Re: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy reference description > > > > > > > > > >>Martin Chapman wrote: Monica, >>I support the suggestion from Ram to update to 1.2 since this is just >> >> >correcting a reference, with no > > >>implication to update to the "latest version". >> >>Martin. >> >> >> >> >mm1: It is the same implication on your latter point Martin - the >reference can be corrected as I stated and not impact "update to latest >version." In addition the suggestion I made is a specification that is >in the W3C rather than to xmlschema.....For what reason would you not >update to the W3C version if the latter condition stayed constant? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > >Unless stated otherwise above: >IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >741598. >Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]