Prasad Yendluri wrote:
Danny van der Rijn wrote:
Point 2:
I wasn't even referring to the URIs in the references section. I was
referring to the references in the text. Search for [ and the first
one you will see is on page 7. That points to the OASIS site. All of
the others that I have spot-checked do, too. I'm not sure if we have
anchors in the references section, or where those are actually supposed
to point to, but pointing to a password-protected OASIS site is not
what was intended, I would imagine.
Yeah, I got you. That is what I meant below also. I think we need to
create the anchors.
Action item 19
Point 1
Normative or non-normative? And thanks for catching the typo in the
URL.
I would think normative, as we just inserted text into the spec that
explicitly refers to this and the associated schema and BP 1.1
compliance is a SHOULD requirement.
Action item 20
Prasad
Danny
Prasad Yendluri wrote:
Regarding, 2nd point below. I now see what you mean. The URIs for entry
in the reference section are pointing to the OASIS site and not the
entries in the reference section. We need to fix that.
Prasad Yendluri wrote:
Danny,
Danny van der Rijn wrote:
Questions:
- Issue 195 adds a reference to the WS-I BP 1.1 Errata:
This XML Schema incorporates fixes for known errors, and is the
XML Schema selected by the WS-I BP 1.1 Errata (October 25, 2005).
Should this document
(http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.0-errata.html)
be included
in either the normative or non-normative references section?
I would think so. BTW it should be a BP 1.1 Errata reference (the above
is a BP 1.0 Errata URL). We can include http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-errata.html
instead. Both
are still Board Approval Drafts, though likely to go final soon.
-
I
notice
that most of the references of the form [WSDL 1.1] [...] have
hyperlinks defined that point to the OASIS site instead of just using
#anchor syntax and referring to the same document. I'm probably in
over my head, but it seems strange. Wondering what I should do for the
[WSDL 1.1] reference I just added, as well as for a possible [WS-I BP
1.1 Errata] reference I may put in as a result of answers to the above
question.
The WSDL 1.1 reference in Section G (References) is pointing to http://www.w3c.org/tr/wsdl
like so,
[WSDL 1.1] Web
Services Definition Language (WSDL) 1.1, W3C Note
I think we want to add this in a similar fashion. Is that not what you
are referring to? I don't see a OASIS site pointer though..
I'm
going
to assume that my questions won't be answered by the time I'm done with
my (other) changes, so I'll attempt to check it in anyway. I may even
succeed in checking in.
If more changes are needed, I'll create an action item to do so.
Thanks
Danny
Regards,
Prasad
|