[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] New Issue - <toPart>s and Anonymous WSDL VariablesClarification (PR2)
+1 from the Canadian judge and the Oregonian. > Alex Yiu wrote: Hi Monica, > +1 to the bug fix and refinement of static analysis. > > I would like to suggest some wordsmithing on the new sentence: > from: > [add sentence] [add new Static Analysis Requirement] At most one > <toPart> exists for each part in the WSDL message definition. If a > process includes more than one <toPart> for each part in the WSDL > message definition, that process MUST be rejected by static > analysis.[end sentence] > > to: > [add sentence] [add new Static Analysis Requirement] At most one > <toPart> exists for each part in the WSDL message definition. If a > process _makes use of a <toParts> element, which_ includes more than > one <toPart> for _a particular_ part in the WSDL message definition, > that process MUST be rejected by static analysis.[end sentence] > > Does it sound good? > Thanks!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]