[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] New issue and proposed resolution
Alternately can we specify a maximum size at, say, 255 for fields that can be demoted to string literals (guids, uris, etc)? While it's easy to handle in memory dynamically, a lot of databases sort of force you to establish the maximum size for a field. On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 04:45 AM, iwasa wrote: > I got a new issue from our development team > who is implementing WS-R spec. > > Issue: > Since the spec doesn't define the max length > of GroupId, some implementation may > fail to deal with some length of GroupId. > > Proposed Resolution: > -Add the following text to the spec: > When RMP received a message with GroupId > or RefToGroupId which value is longer than > the implementation can handle, the RMP MUST > send back a Fault message with "GroupIdTooLong". > > -- > Any comments? > > Thanks, > > Iwasa > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/ > leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]