[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Proposal to resolve REL-49
+1 I don't think there is a dependency. If WSDL 2.0 changes the syntax for F&P or adds, say another attr, it would not affect this version of wsrm. When wsrm v2 is created for WSDL 2.0 then wsrm would use wsdl 2.0 F&P. -Anish -- Jishnu Mukerji wrote: > chris.hipson@bt.com wrote: > >> Jeff said >> >> >>> The proposal is to use a WSDL 1.1 extensibility point. There is no >>> dependency on anything the WSDL 2.0 group may or may not do, now or >>> in the >>> future. >>> >> >> >> Features, Properties and Compositors are features proposed for WSDL >> 2.0. Unless this TC wants to define and maintain them going forward >> then effectively we are discussing an intercept of WSDL 2.0 and there >> IS a dependency... >> >> Chris Hipson BT >> >> >> > Not clear to me that I would call it a dependency..... > > I think what would be acceptable is a position which goes something > like: We use the proposed framework subject to the following: > > 1. The intended scope of use of this framework as an extension point in > WSDL1.1 is constrained to be within the WS-RM spec. This will not be > advertised in the WS-RM spec as a standalone framework for use in WSDL > 1.1 in general. > > 2. When WS-RM evolves to work with WSDL 2.0, assuming that in WSDL 2.0 > a standard mechanism is provided for annotating WSDL with > properties/policies, WS-RM in that version would use the mechanism > provided in WSDL 2.0 instead of the stopgap framework that is being > proposed for WSDL 1.1. > > BTW, there are other candidate ways of doing this (e.g. resource > properties in WSRF, or the Quality of Protection patterns as found in > WS-Security - after all all that is being addressed is annotation about > QoS properties/policies in the realm of Reliability), so we (HP) are not > necessarily married to this one that is being proposed, but would be > happy to have any one (including the one being proposed) that works in > the interim until the underlying core standard like WSDL grows up to > cover this space. > > Jishnu. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]