Action 041304-1 , Action 033004-5

[Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>]

Title: Action 041304-1 , Action 033004-5

Action 041304-1: moot (see last week email, fault info is already in poll responses)

Action 033004-5:

Q: What is the relationship between WS-R and ebXML V2.0?

A: Overall, they both have same messaging reliability contracts as objectives:
guaranteed delivery, no duplicate delivery, ordered delivery, and combinations
of these.  
However, WS-R has improved on scalability and performance by generalizing the
use of sequence numbers, and can accommodate different security and
access conditions on each party, as this is more frequently the case
with a Web service and its clients, compared to more symmetrical
access conditions in messaging. The reliability contract is more
"application-oriented" in WS-R, where acknowledgment is on final delivery,
in contrast to "on receipt" by the message handler in ebMS.

Jacques

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rutt [mailto:tom@coastin.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 8:25 AM
To: wsrm
Subject: [wsrm] List of open WSRM Action Items

The list of open action items, as of 4/13 teleconf follows:

Action 032304-2 – (Sunil & Jacques) Pending

Sunil and Jacques will provide a proposal on retry parameters to the
group before the end of the public review period. – still open

Action 033004-3 – (Jacques) Pending

Jacques took action item to propose new FAQ text for the ws-reliability
features. - open

Action 033004-4 – (Mark G) Pending

Why does the spec have a different name than the TC?

Marc G agreed to propose a new question with new answer to clarify the
matter. - open

Action 033004-5 – (Jacques) Pending

Jacques took action to clearly state what the relation with ebMS is. He
agreed to draft a question with an answer. - open

Action 033004-6 – (Tom) Pending

Need a general question on how can ws reliability be used with other ws
reliability protocols. Answer : we design it as orthogonal, to work with
any other ws- reliability protocol. An example on why we have a reply to
element of our own would help.

Tom Rutt agreed to send a suggested question and proposal out. - open

Action editors-1 – (Marc and Doug) Pending

Marc G and Doug B to updated issues list to reflect agreements in CD
.992. - open

Action 041304-1 – (Jacques) Pending

- Jacques will send an email to initiate email discussion on poll
response for fault conditions

Action 041304-2 – (Iwasa) Pending

- Iwasa to action to consolidate all the agreed comments in text with
change bars against CD .992. A list indicating which meeting minutes’
agreed changes were applied should also be included.

Action 04304-3 – (Sunil) Pending

Sunil took action to consolidate all agreed comments on Schema.

--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt        email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.