[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] clarification on Respond primitive
Tom Rutt wrote:This section is about rm faults.Ok. if it is not about DE and generic Faults, what is the chance that BOTH RM Fault and SOAP Fault need to be sent. I can't think of any cases myself. Even if there are few chances, since it is not for all cases, we have to say "the underlying protocol response MUST contain a SOAP Fault (in the SOAP Body) if exists one in addition to the appropriate RM Fault (in the SOAP Header).". The clarification about duplicate elilmination needs to go in section 4, where duplicate elimination |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]