[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Uploaded contribution (June 30) on messaging model - MEP update
I have uploaded updated pictures for Figure 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 rather than creating new contribution document. Please review the updated figures. Thanks, Iwasa > Comments on how to ammend the figures to go along with Jacques new text: > > Perhaps Iwasa could post another contribution with the figures fixed, > for us to evaluate along with Jacques new text.: > > Figure 2: messaging model (include the Respond primitive (perhaps with > dotted line) down arrow from consumer to receiving rmp > > Figure 3: put solid respond arrow from consumer to receving rmp. Change > "underlying protocol" to "SOAP MEP" on both horizontal arrows > > Figure 4: Change "underlying protocol" to "SOAP MEP" on both horizontal > arrows > > Figure 5: Change "underlying protocol" to "SOAP MEP" on all three > horizontal arrows > > Figure 8: add the down arrow for Respond from consumer to Receiving RMP > > > > Jacques Durand wrote: > > > - Uploaded two versions of the latest "contribution" following last > > conf call (June 29): > > (Note that the name differs from the previous version by only the last > > 2 digits (date-day is "30") ) > > COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-30.pdf > > COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-30.sxw > > > > After this, I'll give up my informal role of "messaging model editor" > > til review/vote, > > as this conflicts somehow with my current vacation time... I'd be > > pleased to > > see someone else take over. > > > > Summary of updates: > > - made updates as discussed (and as I remember). (shortened the text, > > removed unnecessary "RMP invocation patterns", related better the SOAP > > MEP text to RMP) > > - moved up the WSDL-to-RMP mapping from 5.2 to 2.4, > > - more explicit statement on not addressing reliability of WSDL > > Responses (5.2) > > - did most of Tom edits, except for the one below (this would require > > more > > substantial introduction I feel, and is still controversial): > > > > > Page: 45 > > > Line 1354: there could be a note explaining that a wsdl spec that > > > includes the wsrm response element as an output part bound to > > > the soap header is a request/response wsdl operation type. > > > > > > > > > Jacques > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------- > Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com > Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133 > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]