Re: [wsrm] Uploaded contribution (June 30) on messaging model - MEP update

["iwasa" <kiwasa@jp.fujitsu.com>]

I have uploaded updated pictures for Figure 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8
rather than creating new contribution document.

Please review the updated figures.

Thanks,

Iwasa

> Comments on how to ammend the figures to go along with Jacques new text:
>
> Perhaps Iwasa could post another contribution with the figures fixed,
> for us to evaluate along with Jacques new text.:
>
> Figure 2: messaging model (include the Respond primitive (perhaps with
> dotted line) down arrow from consumer to receiving rmp
>
> Figure 3: put solid respond arrow from consumer to receving rmp.  Change
> "underlying protocol" to "SOAP MEP" on both horizontal arrows
>
> Figure 4: Change "underlying protocol" to "SOAP MEP" on both horizontal
> arrows
>
> Figure 5: Change "underlying protocol" to "SOAP MEP" on all three
> horizontal arrows
>
> Figure 8: add the down arrow for Respond from consumer to Receiving RMP
>
>
>
> Jacques Durand wrote:
>
> > - Uploaded two versions of the latest "contribution" following last
> > conf call (June 29):
> > (Note that the name differs from the previous version by only the last
> > 2 digits (date-day is "30") )
> > COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-30.pdf
> > COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-30.sxw
> >
> > After this, I'll give up my informal role of "messaging model editor"
> > til review/vote,
> > as this conflicts somehow with my current vacation time... I'd be
> > pleased to
> > see someone else take over.
> >
> > Summary of updates:
> > - made updates as discussed (and as I remember). (shortened the text,
> > removed unnecessary "RMP invocation patterns", related better the SOAP
> > MEP text to RMP)
> > - moved up the WSDL-to-RMP mapping from 5.2 to 2.4,
> > - more explicit statement on not addressing reliability of WSDL
> > Responses (5.2)
> > - did most of Tom edits, except for the one below (this would require
> > more
> > substantial introduction I feel, and is still controversial):
> >
> > > Page: 45
> > > Line 1354: there could be a note explaining that a wsdl spec that
> > > includes the wsrm response element as an output part bound to
> > > the soap header is a request/response wsdl operation type.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Jacques
> >
>
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>