[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Proposal to accomodate Chris Ferris comments - batch 2
I am happy with Doug's edit Tom Rutt Doug Bunting wrote: > Tom, > > A few comments below... > > On 16-Jul-04 14:18, Tom Rutt wrote: > >> Proposed clarification text to accommodate Chris Ferris comments – >> second >> batch >> >> Comment 4: Improper reference for ws security > > This was comment 3. Thanks for filling in the details I left out of > my "3,4,6,8,10" email. > > ... > >> Comment 8: Definition of PollRequest message > > ... > >> “ >> PollRequest Message: >> A message sent by the Sending RMP to the Receiving RMP that requests >> that >> it respond with RM-Reply information.“ >> “ > > I would prefer we use the suggestion I made earlier which avoids the > passive voice and describes a requirement not made clear elsewhere in > the specification: > > "A message the Sending RMP sends to the Receiving RMP, requesting > RM-Replies for identified earlier Reliable Messages. Support for this > message is REQUIRED as part of the Poll RM-Reply pattern (see section > 2.5.3). This message MAY also be used to augment other RM-Reply > patterns." > > ... > > more later, > doug > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]