[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Contribution taking away one-way restriction on Callback and Poll
Due to the issue raised by Jacques in his email, I did not initiate the Kavi CD ballot on draft 1.85 To facillitate discussion and, possibly, voting on a CD at our next Teleconference, I just posted a contribution which removes the restriction (and fixes a typo) Based on Jacques email, I produced a version which takes away the restriction of using call back and poll with only one-way mep. I also corrected a typo. I just posted the revision as contribution: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8706/WS-Reliability-1085ter.sxw http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8707/WS-Reliability-1085ter.pdf http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8708/WS-Reliability-1085ter-diff.pdf Requirement R3.7 states: *R3.7 *The Specification must support the Polling RM-Reply Pattern for WSDL 1.1 Request-Reply operations. While there is no corresponding requirement for Callback Reply pattern, it was allowed in all prior CDs we have voted on. Since the protocol will work with callback reply pattern with request-reply operations, there is no reason for the restriction at this late time in the progression of this specification. The restrictions pointed out by Jacques, in section 6, have been there since CD .992 and earlier, however they are pertinent only for the one-way example, as shown in the figures. These had to be clarified as pertaining to one-way. The following changes were made, against draft 1.085 http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8689/WS-Reliability-2004-08-12.pdf , to take away restrictions on use of callback and poll only with one-way mep. Page: 11 Sequence number: 1 Type: Typographic error line 336 - "between between" Page: 13 Sequence number: 1 Type: Undue Restriction lines 407-412 - Jacques email points out that this restriction of callback Reply pattern to soap One Way is a technical change which is not required for the protocol to work. While releasing this restriction may not impact most use cases for the protocol, it takes away a capability which has always existed in previous CDs. Page: 14 Sequence number: 1 Type: Undue Restriction lines 415-427: This new text introduces a restriction of poll request to one-way soap mep, which is not required for the protocol to work. This restriction is not necessary for the protocol to work. Page: 52 Sequence number: 1 Type: Undue Restriction line 1416: While the statement that , for Callback Reply pattern, the HTTP response has no message body is appropriate for the example, it is not a restriction required by the protocol. Should clarify that "in this example, the HTTP response". Sequence number: 2 Type: Undue Restriction lines 1409-14ll: the sentence "To achieve this, the Receiving RMP MUST NOT return a SOAP Fault and the HTTP response entity body SHALL be empty." is pertinent only for OneWay operations, since request/response is allowed by the protocol, this statment must be weakened to the one way case. Page: 54 Sequence number: 1 Type: Undue Restriction lines 1484-1485: As in the callback text, This sentence is only pertient to one way operations, and it should be clarified that it is not a requirement for request response operations. Page: 55 Sequence number: 1 Type: Undue restriction line 1494: While the statement that, for Poll reply pattern, the HTTP response has no message body is appropriate for the example, it is not a restriction required by the protocol. Should clarify by inserting "in this example, the HTTP response". -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]