[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Semantics of capabilities in property descriptions
When a producer declares that a given property is required (via capability wsrp:required), is it valid for a consumer to not supply a value. There may be use cases where the consumer cannot simply supply a value. The current wording in the spec is as follows: wsrp:required: This capability means that the user has to supply a value for this property. If this capability is not set, the user of the property may choose whether or not to supply a value. The intent of this wording (particularly the second sentence) is not very clear to me. I presume the term "user" means the "sender" of the property. (BTW, the term "capability" in this context seems a bit awkward.) Comments? Subbu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]