[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Fwd: Bugs in WSRP v2 WSDL?]
Rich, FYI ...Are these issues? -Mike-
--- Begin Message ---
- From: Ian Penning <ian.penning@oracle.com>
- To: Michael Freedman <michael.freedman@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:11:02 +0000
--- End Message ---
Hi Mike,
There are a couple of discrepancies between the WSRP draft spec and the WSDL. According to the spec, the ccppHeaders field on ClientData is optional (which is what I'd expect) but in the WSDL (wsrp_v2_types.xsd) we have:
<complexType name="ClientData">
<complexContent>
<extension base="v1types:ClientData">
<sequence>
<element name="ccppHeaders" type="types:CCPPHeaders" />
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
i.e. ccppHeaders is mandatory.
Secondly, according to the spec the ccppProfileWarning on MarkupContext is optional, but in the WSDL we have:
<complexType name="MarkupContext">
<complexContent>
<extension base="v1types:MarkupContext">
<sequence>
<element name="ccppProfileWarning" type="xsd:string" />
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
i.e. ccppProfileWarning is mandatory.
Could you check this out and confirm that the WSDL is wrong in both cases?
thanks,
Ian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]