[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-seg] Xliff-Seg Meeting Minutes 23-Mar-04
John, was there a discussion on the
scenarios? Cheers, -Gérard Families are living sanctuaries From: John Reid
[mailto:JREID@novell.com] Hi All, I don't know how to
enter this into Kavi so I'm sending it to the list. If I have something wrong,
please let me know and I'll try to correct it. Regards, jr 1. Roll Call > Magnus, Tony, Eiju,
Andrezj, Christian; Apologies: Yves, Gérard 2. Approval of Minutes
from Last Meeting > Tony moved, all
approved 3. Change of Meeting
Schedule - 2nd and 4th Tuesday of
each month to avoid clashes with TC meetings >> Magnus pointed
out that a fortnightly schedule will eventually clash with the TC's 3rd Tuesday
of the month schedule and proposed a schedule of the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of
the month. >> all approved >> Magnus will
update schedule 4. Work in Progress a) Scenarios b) Use Cases c) Implementation
Options >> Magnus briefed
all on a document he authored and sent out a few hours before the meeting (due
to technical difficulties), "Case for Segmentation in XLIFF". There
was a number of discussion points raised during the briefing: >> Andrezj
disagreed with the the statements concerning a filter's ability to segment
a document. After a shhort discussion it was agreed to continue the discussion
via an email thread. >> John and Tony
questioned the reasoning behind the introduction and structure of the
<segment> element. Tony pointed out that it seemed to only add another
level that would still have all the same problems and suggested just using
<trans-unit> in the same manner. Magnus justified the new element on the
grounds that it needed to capture much the same data as captured in a
<trans-unit> but that the <trans-unit> represents a hard boundary
that cannot be altered because of the reliance on that element of the filters
and skeleton file. Andrezj questioned the need to add segmentation complexity
to XLIFF at all; instead proposing that the XLIFF is transformed into another
form for segmentation and translation. >> Tony pointed
out some differences between his own workflow and that represented in the
document. Magnus acknowledged the possible variations. >> Magnus asked for
any input from the group on updating the TM, workflows, and any other input on
the document. 5. Any other business >> Tony brought up
use cases and suggested that we settle on a few. >> Christian
pointed out the differences between views of segmentation held within the
group. Action Items 1. Andrezj will start
a thread adressing his issues on segmentation by filters. 2. Tony will start a thread
addressing his issues with the proposed segmentation structure. 3. All shoult address TM
updating. 4. All should address workflow
variations that can affect segmentation. 5. Christian will start a
thread on the different views of segmentation held by the group. 6. Magnus will change the
schedule to meet every 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]