Meeting started at 8:00  PDT

====================================================================

Roll Call

Voting Members:

---------------------------------

Alejandro Abdelnur     Sun                      yes

Sasha Aickin           Plumtree                 no

Subbu Allamaraju       BEA                      yes

Olin Atkinson          Novell                   yes

Atul Batra             Sun                      no

Amir Blich             SAP                      no

Chris Braun            Novell                   yes

Rex Brooks             Starbourne               yes

T.J. Cox               Novell                   no

William Cox            BEA                      no

Winston Damarillo      GlueCode Software        no

Brian Dirking          Stellent                 no

Michael Freedman       Oracle                   yes

Ross Fubini            Plumtree                 no

Noah Guyot             Vignette                 yes

David Holladay         Microsoft                yes

Richard Jacob          IBM                      no

Dimitri Jirov          SAP                      yes

Jon Klein              Reed-Elsevier            no

Andre Kramer           Citrix                   yes

Alan Kropp             Vignette yes

Carsten Leue           IBM                      no

Dan Machak             Tibco                    yes

David Raphael Ericsson no

Nigel Ratcliffe        Factiva                  no

Thomas Schaeck         IBM                      no

Steven Smith           Capitol College          no

Yossi Tamari           SAP              yes

Rich Thompson          IBM                      yes

Charles Wiecha         IBM                      no

Total voting members:          30

Voting members in attendance:  14 (46%)

A quorum was not present.

Members on Leave Of Absence

----------------------------

Sunit Randhawa         Fujitsu                  LOA

Joe Rudnicki           U.S. Navy                LOA

Eric van Lydegraf      Kinzan                   LOA

Prospective Members (non-voting):

---------------------------------

Metin Ergener Vignette no

WSIA Members (non-voting):

-----------------------------

Ravi Konuru            IBM                      no

Bruce Lucas IBM no

Graeme Riddell Bowstreet no

Agenda:

No quorum, proceed with discussion of some of the agenda items

1. Accept previous minutes [requires quorum? bring up in next meeting]

2. SC Status/Issues
  2.1 Interoperability (Richard)
  2.2 Conformance (Rich)
  2.3 Markup (Rex/Andre)
  2.4 WSDL (Andre)
  2.5 PFB (Alan)
  2.6 Coordination (Rich)
  2.7 Interfaces (Mike)

3. Outstanding errata issues:

Deferred discussion on most of the outstanding errata.

Discussed Alan K.’s proposal to rename the InteractionParams.portletState field to “portletStateChange”, to avoid confusion with PortletContext.portletState.

3.1   #23. 5/22/03 (Interoperability SC)
SOAP 1.2 is dropping the convention using ‘.’ as a delimiter within error codes. Suggest that WSRP does likewise and just uses leaf error code in a namespaced manner. Andre: JAXRPC does not allow setting of the fault code? SOAP 1.2 naming conventions will differ from SOAP 1.1, so WSRP will need to remain compliant.

Document: Spec
Section: 13
Old Text: WSDL defines fault codes to be strings using “.” as a delimiter to scope the error codes. The following are defined for constructing a WSRP error code within the same namespace as used for the rest of the types defined by this specification:

New Text: The following WSRP error codes are defined within the same namespace as the rest of the types defined by this specification:

action: Drop “Top Level" column from table in section 13. Rename "Specific Code" column header to "Fault Code”.
action: Drop “Interface.” and “Security.” from fault codes throughout spec. Double check equivalent in WSDL.




5.  Primer: Need volunteers to edit/update current draft
    - SCs will need to assist preparing relevant sections
    - Will be needed this fall as marketing of the WSRP standard kicks off. Volunteers: Unnamed, Rex, Subbu, Alan. There will be a short meeting after next week’s TC call.


6.  Promotion of WSRP as a standard
   Ideas todate include:
    - Conferences (XML2003, others?)
    - Articles such as Eilon's last year (Thomas, Carsten and Richard have written one for a German newspaper)
    - Reviews by companies such as O'Reillys
    - OASIS promotion (Rich to contact Carol Geyer)
    - Others?


7.  Should we require that our URL expression be encoded such that it is valid for the mime type into which it is placed? Alej: How would Producer know the end-user content type? Rich: It would be valid for the fragment.

8. Namespace Prefix. Alej: Would prefer a unique token, rather than overloading wsrp-rewrite. Mike F: Space termination could be a problem. Rich: No terminator in latest proposal, not needed. [see Chris B.’s proposal for CSS naming convention]. Regarding Alej’s proposal to make prefix required in both rewriting scenarios: Alej: Wasn’t aware that namespace prefix template is a req’d template when producer rewrites.

9. Possible new erratum: URL encode whitespace in templates?

Meeting adjourned at 8:45 PDT