|
|
|
| Represent
existing directory |
||
| protocols with new transport syntax |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • | Don’t
want new protocols |
|||||||||
| • | Don’t
want divergence in way protocols are handled |
|||||||||
| • | 2251
conformance necessary but not sufficient |
|||||||||
| • | What
about LDAP extensions, VLV etc? |
|||||||||
| • | Just
make an alternative representation, don’t try to solve |
|||||||||
| LDAP
problems in DSML |
||||||||||
| • | Proposed
additions that might provide functionality not in |
|||||||||
| LDAP
should be evaluated very carefully. (Eg. specifying |
||||||||||
| serial/parallel
operation and interoperability for common |
||||||||||
| operations) |
||||||||||