OASIS Web Services for Remote Portals (WSRP) TC
WSRP Teleconference Minutes
March 4, 2003
Call Started at 9:07 AM PST
Roll Call
|
Voting Members: |
Company |
|
|
Abdelnur, Alejandro |
Sun |
Yes |
|
Aickin, Sasha |
Plumtree |
No |
|
Allamaruaju, Subbu |
BEA |
Yes |
|
Atkinson, Olin |
Novell |
Yes |
|
Batra, Atul |
Sun |
Yes |
|
Blich, Amir |
SAP |
Yes |
|
Braun, Chris |
Novell |
No |
|
Brooks, Rex |
Starbourne |
Yes |
|
Cox, T.J. |
Novell |
No |
|
Cox, William |
BEA |
No |
|
Dirking, Brian |
Stellent |
No |
|
Freedman, Michael |
Oracle |
Yes |
|
Fubini, Ross |
Plumtree |
Yes |
|
Jacob, Richard |
IBM |
Yes |
|
Klien, Jon |
Reed-Elsivier |
Yes |
|
Kramer, Andre |
Citrix |
Yes |
|
Kropp, Alan |
Vignette Corporation |
Yes |
|
Leue, Carsten |
IBM |
Yes |
|
Machak, Dan |
Tibco |
Yes |
|
Mitsuoka, Madoka |
Fujitsu |
Yes |
|
Nolan, Adam |
Reed-Elsivier |
Yes |
|
Palas, Petr |
Moravia IT |
No |
|
Randhawa, Sunit |
Fujitsu |
Yes |
|
Ratcliffe, Nigel |
Factiva |
Yes |
|
Shumaker, Gennady |
SAP |
Yes |
|
Smith, Steven |
Capitol College |
No |
|
Tamari, Yossi |
SAP |
Yes |
|
Tayar, Gil |
WebCollage |
No |
|
Thompson, Rich |
IBM |
Yes |
|
van Lydegraf, Eric |
Kinzan |
No |
|
Wiecha, Charles |
IBM |
Yes |
Total voting members: 31
Voting members in attendance: 22 (71%)
A quorum was present.
|
Members on Leave of Absence: |
|
|
|
Ramesh, Raj |
CommerceOne |
LOA |
|
Rudnicki, Joe |
U.S. Navy |
LOA |
|
Schaeck, Thomas |
IBM |
LOA |
Summary of the substantive changes:
|
175 - Clarify available modes |
ACCEPTED |
|
176 - ID, Key and Handle not used in WSDL |
ACCEPTED |
|
180 - Correct section reference |
ACCEPTED |
|
181 - Reword "block all" |
ACCEPTED |
|
182 - Clearer definition of extensions field |
ACCEPTED |
|
168 - Nil desiredLocales => sendAllLocales? |
ACCEPTED |
|
141 - Add previous windowState and mode? |
DEFERRED (Pending JSR) |
|
178 - markupCharacterSet in MarkupContext |
ACCEPTED* |
|
139 - Add optional UpdateResponse.isSecure? |
DEFERRED (version 1.1) |
|
166 - Add UserProfile.profileItems? |
ACCEPTED* |
|
194 - P3P alignment |
ACCEPTED |
|
165 - no userProfile vs no userProfile data |
DEFERRED (version 1.1) |
Small editorial/grammar changes:
175 - Clarify available modes
Section 5.1.10 / Page 19 / Line 39
Adds language for what modes are available and which should be described
176 - ID, Key and Handle not used in WSDL
wsrp_v1_types.xsd
Add comments about why the types Handle, ID and Key are not used in the WSDL
180 - Correct section reference
Section 3.8 / Page 13 / Line 14
181 - Reword "block all"
Section 3.10 / Page 13 / Line 33
Proposes rewording in the negative so that the word "block" is not used.
182 - Clearer definition of extensions field
Section 5.1.6 + many others / Page 17 / Line 41
Proposal rewords this oft repeated statement.
Resolution: Accepted
168 - Nil desiredLocales => sendAllLocales?
Sections 5.2 & 8.2 / Page/Line: 25/23 & 52/17
Proposal is to drop sendAllLocales in favor of a nil value for desiredLocales
Resolution: Accepted
141 - Add previous windowState and mode?
Section 6.1.2 / Page 26 / Line 46
This would place the burden of remembering the previous windowsState and mode on the Consumer and thereby permit the Portlet to know about interesting transitions that do not involve user interactions with the Portlet's markup.
Resolution: Deferred (JSR-168 is still defining this behavior)
178 - markupCharacterSet in MarkupContext
Section 6.1.10 / Page 31 / Line 26
Proposal adds this field. Email discussion has suggested adding text referencing the RFC for mime types and providing an example for declaring the charset.
encoded in content type. Only really needed for binary data, where the binary data is text.
Resolution: Accepted: Will not be a separate field, but will be provided in content type. Will reference mime-type RFC and provide an example. Will be a MUST for binary data.
Add language as similar to UploadContext
139 - Add optional UpdateResponse.isSecure?
Section 6.1.13 / Page 34 / Line 32
This would enable the return from performBlockingInteraction() to change whether or not the Portlet needs the client page to be secure.
Resolution: Defer consideration until 1.1 spec.
166 - Add UserProfile.profileItems?
Section 6.1.18 / Page 64 / Line 18
Proposal is for an explicit mechanism to carry string extensions to the UserProfile
Resolution: Accepted. Add comment: A common extension would be to send profile values as NamedString type.
194 - P3P alignment
Section 6.1.18 and 11 / Page/Line: 35/49 + pages 68-69
Notes that the change of the name field to personname was not carried throughout
Resolution: Accepted
165 - Semantics of no userProfile vs no userProfile data
Section 6.1.19 / Page 39 / Line 22
Proposal is to inform Portlets when the UserContext is shared using a nil userProfile.
Resolution: Defer consideration until 1.1 spec.
Next Meeting:
Thursday March 6
8:00 am PST / 11:00 am EST / 5:00 pm CET
duration: 2 hours
Meeting adjournded at 10:00 AM PST