OASIS Web Services for Remote Portals (WSRP) TC

WSRP/WSIA Telecon 12/19/02

Roll

WSIA (not WSRP) Members Attending: 4 (sorry, didn't catch the names)
30 of 40 members attending.

Correction to Minutes of 12 December 2002

• Item #154, remove "(matches JSR168)". We will re-open this issue to synchronize with JSR 168.

Mintues of 12 December accepted with correction.

#154 Discussion

• We will synchronize with JSR168
• Gil will produce 3 versions for the Primer (such as configuredPortlet).

Will not change API names.

#186 Tokens for default template

• No objections

#171 Move examples

• Expand "typical process flow" section
• No objections

#172 Remove "interaction lifecycle states"

• no objections

#173 Summary not yet added

• Rich will post

#179 Sematics for requestParameter - how does that work with POST?

Discussion highlights

• Form parameters are passed by:
  1. Binary upload
  2. Form parameter field
  3. Merged into request parameter
• Need to strengthen language. GET uses requestParameter for stuff that could not go into NavState.
• New issue for PUT.
• Form parameters vs query parameters
• Security breach not different from multi-hop.
• Is it too complex to have two options? Producer has to be ready for all allowable options.
• Does post data belong to Producer or Consumer?
• .Net is different from JSR168 on this issue.
• Carsten will send out an email about position. He will also talk with JSR168.
• We will continue the discussion at 2 January 2003 meeting

#177 Change "should" to "may" for locale and end user settings

• no objections

#180 <BASE> tag should be with "other tags"

• no objections

#184 Can performInteraction return new navigationalState?

• Dan Machak will report back from JSR168
• Deferred to 2 January 2003 meeting

#178 Consumer should not use a mode not specified in metadata

• Resolved: Change "must" to "must not"
• no objections

#174 Roles: Change "must" to "must not"

• no objections

#176 Change "must" to "should" so Producer allows return of all locales.

• Network implications need to be addressed
• no objections

#187

• We will address this 2 January 2003 with issue #179

#170 Scope of Producer

• We will discuss this on 2 January 2003

Meeting ended 12:36pm EST