XSLT/XPath Test Suite Review Tracking Mechanism.

Tests Sorted by Status (See critical list at end of table)

Date: August 27, 2002

Accepted Tests

Test idSumbitterTest DateReviewer(s)/review-dateComments
numbering01Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node
numbering02Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering03Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node
numbering04Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering05Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering06Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering07Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering08Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering09Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering10Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node
numbering11Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering12Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering13Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering14Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering15Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok, however I am not quite that familiar with the Greek characters.
Test Looks ok
numbering16Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering17Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok (I think)
Test Looks ok
numbering18Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok. MSXML3 and MSXML4 produce unexpected results, different from those of XalanJ2.3 and Saxon 6.5.2
numbering19Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering20Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Dimitre Novatchev / 2002-08-01
Test looks ok
Test Looks ok
numbering51Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering52Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering53Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering54Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering55Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering56Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering57Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering58Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Shoudn't (1 mod 2) != 1)?, I dont see why the first "note" has a number 1.(see output)
OK
numbering59Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering60Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering61Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering62Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering63Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering64Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Shoudn't elements "aaa", "bbb","ccc", "mmm", "nnn", and "ooo" have no number since they do not have a "chapter" parent?
OK
numbering65Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering66Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering67Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering68Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering69Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Shoudn't the "e" elements have a number (other than 0) associated with it?
OK
numbering70Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering71Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering72Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering73Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering74Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering75Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering76Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering77Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering78Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering79Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering80Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering81Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering82Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering83Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering84Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks ok
OK
numbering85Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK
numbering86Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK
numbering87Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK
numbering88Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK
numbering89Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK
numbering90Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK
numbering91Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-18
Jeff Kenton / 2002-07-31
Test looks
OK

Tests Under Review in Need of one Decision

Test idSumbitterTest DateReviewer(s)/review-dateComments
10052Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok. The xmlfile "91021.xml" is already associated with "91021.xsl" (using the "href" attribute), it may cause confusion for users.
10053Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok. The xmlfile "91021.xml" is already associated with "91021.xsl" (using the "href" attribute), it may cause confusion for users.
84679Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok.
84680Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Test Looks ok
84680-textMicrosoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok. Output file is empty. File "84680.xml" is already associated with "84680.xsl" (with the href attribute and may cause confusion). Should use instead "84680-text.xsl".
84681Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Test Looks ok
84681-textMicrosoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok. Output file is empty. File "84681.xml" is already associated with "84681.xsl" (with the href attribute and may cause confusion). Should use instead "84681-text.xsl".
84683Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Test looks ok
84684Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Test looks ok
84687Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Test looks ok
84692Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Test can be more atomic.
84694Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Not Available / N/A
Whats the main purpose of the test?, format or level? or both?
84698Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-065
Not Available / N/A
Test looks ok. Can use a reference to the "position()" function on description.
84699_1Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "a". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_10Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "A". Documentation can be mesleading. Test looks the same as "84699_2"
84699_11Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05
Only tests format = "A.1". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_12Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05
Only tests format = "A=". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_13Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05
Only tests format = "*". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_14Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05
Only tests format = "A 1 A 1 A 1". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_15Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-05
Only tests for unknown formats. Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_2Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "A". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_3Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "1". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_4Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "i". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_5Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "i.I.a.A". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_6Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "@a". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_7Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "*1A". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_8Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "1>". Documentation can be mesleading.
84699_9Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Only tests format = "". Documentation can be mesleading.
84700Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Arabin to properly comment.
84701Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-05
Test will never get to the "count" statement. No "n" element.
84702Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-02-06
Expected output do not reflect data. Not sure about test purpose (argument is not empty)
84706Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Are we expecting some kind of an error here?
84714Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Hindu Vowels to properly comment.
84715Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Thai language to properly comment. My screen only displays "?" for XML data. My implementation quits when executing this test.
84716Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Russian language to properly comment. My screen only display "?" for XML data.
84717Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Japanese language to properly comment.
84719Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Korean language to properly comment.
84720Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok.
84722Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok, can be further more atomic (however not a critical change).
84723Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Taiwanese language to properly comment. My screen only displays "?" for XML data.
84725Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Chinese to properly comment.
84726Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test is probably ok, not familiar with Far East Ideographic to properly comment.
91022Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
What's the relevance of the data in the "91022.xml" file?
91023Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
What's the relevance of the data in the "91023.xml" file? Unable to run test using other processors.
91027Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test Looks ok
91028Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Got different results using another processor.
91029Microsoft2001-07-01Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Got different results using another processor.
numbering21Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
The output indicates that all nodes "note" were counted, is that right?
numbering22Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering23Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering24Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering25Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering26Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering27Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering28Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering29Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering30Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering31Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering32Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering33Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering34Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering35Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering36Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering37Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering38Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering39Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering40Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering41Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering42Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering43Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering44Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering45Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering46Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering47Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering48Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering49Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numbering50Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-15
Test looks ok
numberingerr01Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Did not get the expected error
numberingerr02Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Did not get the expected error
numberingerr03Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Did not get the expected error
numberingerr04Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Test looks and worked ok
numberingerr05Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Test looks and works ok
numberingerr06Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Did not get the expected error
numberingerr07Lotus/IBM2001-12-24Carmelo Montanez / 2002-03-19
Test looks and works ok