None Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test Looks ok Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test Looks ok None Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok none Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok None Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test can be more atomic. Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Whats the main purpose of the test?, format or level? or both? Carmelo Montanez Not Available 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. Can use a reference to the "position()" function on description. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test will never get to the "count" statement. No "n" element. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Expected output do not reflect data. Not sure about test purpose (argument is not empty) Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "a". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "A". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "1". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "i". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "i.I.a.A". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "@a". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "*1A". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "1>". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "A". Documentation can be mesleading. Test looks the same as "84699_2" Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "A.1". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "A=". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "*". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests format = "A 1 A 1 A 1". Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Only tests for unknown formats. Documentation can be mesleading. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft What's the relevance of the data in the "91022.xml" file? Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft What's the relevance of the data in the "91023.xml" file? Unable to run test using other processors. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Are we expecting some kind of an error here? Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test Looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Got different results using another processor. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Got different results using another processor. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Arabin to properly comment. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Chinese to properly comment. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Far East Ideographic to properly comment. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok, can be further more atomic (however not a critical change). Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Hindu Vowels to properly comment. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Japanese language to properly comment. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Korean language to properly comment. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Russian language to properly comment. My screen only display "?" for XML data. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Taiwanese language to properly comment. My screen only displays "?" for XML data. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test is probably ok, not familiar with Thai language to properly comment. My screen only displays "?" for XML data. My implementation quits when executing this test. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. The xmlfile "91021.xml" is already associated with "91021.xsl" (using the "href" attribute), it may cause confusion for users. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. The xmlfile "91021.xml" is already associated with "91021.xsl" (using the "href" attribute), it may cause confusion for users. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. Output file is empty. File "84680.xml" is already associated with "84680.xsl" (with the href attribute and may cause confusion). Should use instead "84680-text.xsl". Carmelo Montanez 2001-07-01 Microsoft Test looks ok. Output file is empty. File "84681.xml" is already associated with "84681.xsl" (with the href attribute and may cause confusion). Should use instead "84681-text.xsl". Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok, however I am not quite that familiar with the Greek characters. Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok (I think) Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM The output indicates that all nodes "note" were counted, is that right? Looks correct to me. I also agree with 0 vs empty string when no matching node (Tom A). Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Minor nit: Could omit the 'from'; otherwise, output is correct, scope is good, and description is accurate and clear - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Scope a little wide; tests both sort and number; good test otherwise - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Scope a little wide; interacts with mode; otherwise, good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Accept, but description could be better - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test, though very similar to 32 - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test, though very similar to 33 - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test, though description could be more specific - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test. Saxon 6.2 is incorrect - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test, though description could be a little more specific - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test, but almost redundant with 37 - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test, but very similar to 41 - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez Tom Amiro 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Good test - Tom A Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Shoudn't (1 mod 2) != 1)?, I dont see why the first "note" has a number 1.(see output) Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Shoudn't elements "aaa", "bbb","ccc", "mmm", "nnn", and "ooo" have no number since they do not have a "chapter" parent? Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Shoudn't the "e" elements have a number (other than 0) associated with it? Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Did not get the expected error Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Did not get the expected error Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Did not get the expected error Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks and worked ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks and works ok Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Did not get the expected error Carmelo Montanez 2001-12-24 Lotus/IBM Test looks and works ok Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK Jeff Kenton LotusIBM OK None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok, but an unnecessary xsl:apply-templates within a template matching a text node None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok. MSXML3 and MSXML4 produce unexpected results, different from those of XalanJ2.3 and Saxon 6.5.2 None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok None Dimitre Novatchev 2001-08-01 LotusIBM Test Looks ok