[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] Context
> > as issue list maintainer: I won't make this a new issue > > unless you ask, but will if you do. > > Hmm. I'm in two minds. Is it possible to make it an issue for the 1.1 > version of the spec :-) That's almost more of a PR question than anything else. I think if it gets put on the current list, it's a candidate for 1.0, but a potential resolution is "deferred" to future version. > I definitely don't want to get rid of the context, but I am starting to > think it should only appear in application messages, and not in the > transaction-coordination messages. I think it could well be a useful > factorisation. > > For example, someone building a BTP-aware service will only have to > understand what a Context is, whereas people building transaction managers > don't. The people in the middle (i.e. application developers or > more likely > those that develop infrastructure for applications) must understand both, > but then they are in the right position to do so since they know about > services and transactions. I would hope that people building transaction managers would understand how to use transactions, at least in theory :-) > How about if anyone else apart from me thinks it's an issue then > let's talk > about it, otherwise let's put it asside for now. Anyone else have anything > to say? Fine. Does Jim have a seconder ? Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC