Re: [cti-taxii] New Work - Pagination

["Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>]

Can we outline the problem sets / challenges
with item-based paging, so everyone is on the same page WRT the discussion?

As well, currently  you can already
"page by date" in TAXII (like you could in TAXII 1) - so in effect
we have two mechanisms already. Are we talking about changing that as well?

-
Jason Keirstead
Lead Architect - IBM.Security
www.ibm.com/security

"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those
who hustle." - Unknown 




From:      
 Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com>
To:      
 "cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org"
<cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:      
 09/17/2018 01:11 PM
Subject:    
   [cti-taxii]
New Work - Pagination
Sent by:    
   <cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

All,

Now that TAXII 2.1 Working Draft 03 is
up for Committee Specification Draft 01 ballot, I would like to start requesting
proposals for how we should address and solve pagination for TAXII 2.1.
 As you know, we tried to use HTTP's native "Item" based
pagination in TAXII 2.0, but after doing additional research and trying
to implement this, we discovered that not only is this a known "do
not do for RESTful APIs" but it is also near impossible to implement
in code given the STIX dataset. 

I know several of you have expressed
ideas for how this could be done/fixed in TAXII 2.1, so I am asking as
one of your sub-committee co-chairs to please write up your ideas and submit
them to the TAXII email list as proposals. 

Thanks
Bret