[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita-machine-industry] Urgent - Question from the TC regarding Task Requirements Domain
Did anyone answer this? If not, I will add it to the list of issues to address in DITA 1.3. Best, Su-Laine Su-Laine Yeo Solutions Consultant JustSystems Canada, Inc. Office: 778-327-6356 syeo@justsystems.com www.justsystems.com XMetaL Community Forums: http://forums.xmetal.com/ -----Original Message----- From: christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch [mailto:christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:27 AM To: dita-machine-industry@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [dita-machine-industry] Urgent - Question from the TC regarding Task Requirements Domain Today at the TC meeting a member asked why the two elements reqconds and reqpers have been derived from OL (numbered liste) and not from UL (bulleted list). Is there a special reason why we have choosen OL. I can not recall why we decided to inherit reqconds and reqpers from OL and not from UL. E.g. we derived supplyli from UL. We wrote the DTD in September 2007, can anyone recall why we have choosen OL to inherit reqconds and reqpers and not UL? Best regards Chris
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]