[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] Draft 02 of the object naming guidelines
Trevor - OK. It looks like I forgot that bit. Any excuse to do a version 3!. Is the Hirsch spec. considered the basis for going forward? If so, we could call it oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-wd-01 All the best. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:trevp@trevp.net] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 11:22 PM To: Tim Moses; 'DSS' Subject: Re: [dss] Draft 02 of the object naming guidelines At 03:31 PM 9/5/2003 -0400, Tim Moses wrote: >Colleagues - Here is the second draft of the object naming guidelines, >incorporating the best of the ideas discussed on the list. Maybe, we can >consider adoption of these guidelines during our teleconference on Monday >(item 7 on the agenda). All the best. Tim. Looks good, though I didn't see it mentioned that "Part" could be omitted on docs applicable to all the TC's activities? Would these be good names for our current docs? - oasis-dss-1.0-requirements-wd-12 oasis-dss-1.0-object-naming-guidelines-wd-02 oasis-dss-1.0-timestamp-token-schema-wd-01 oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-hirsch-01 oasis-dss-1.0-core-schema-perrin-02 oasis-dss-1.0-core-spec-cruellas-01 [1] oasis-dss-1.0-core-schema-cruellas-01 [2] (The first would be Juan Carlos' document from 9/4. The second would combine Juan Carlos' proposals for Signing and Verifying into a single schema). Trevor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]