[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-514) Still, the conformance clauses are some of the most decent in MQTT5 compared to many specs!
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Borgendale updated MQTT-514: -------------------------------- Description: TAB-1564 - Jacques Durand In spite of all my previous comments on COnformance, the conformance section in this specification is fairly decent ! The conf section job is greatly facilitated by the well worded normative statements with clear assignment to the conformance targets. All my previous comments were tagged "minor" (I think) - they are not critical and should not warrant by themselves a new review cycle. But should be fixed if an opportunity shows up. Several (and maybe all?) could fall under editorial - non material - changes (e.g. the one about renaming "Conformance clause" section and bringing up the functional definition of conformance targets.). Good job to MQTT editors! was: TAB-1564 - Jacques Durand In spite of all my previous comments on COnformance, the conformance section in this specification is fairly decent ! The conf section job is greatly facilitated by the well worded normative statements with clear assignment to the conformance targets. All my previous comments were tagged "minor" (I think) - they are not critical and should not warrant by themselves a new review cycle. But should be fixed if an opportunity shows up. Several (and maybe all?) could fall under editorial - non material - changes (e.g. the one about renaming "Conformance clause" section and bringing up the > Still, the conformance clauses are some of the most decent in MQTT5 compared to many specs! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MQTT-514 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-514 > Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: edits > Affects Versions: 5, CSD01 > Reporter: Ken Borgendale > Priority: Minor > Labels: TAB > > TAB-1564 - Jacques Durand > In spite of all my previous comments on COnformance, the conformance section in this specification is fairly decent ! The conf section job is greatly facilitated by the well worded normative statements with clear assignment to the conformance targets. All my previous comments were tagged "minor" (I think) - they are not critical and should not warrant by themselves a new review cycle. But should be fixed if an opportunity shows up. Several (and maybe all?) could fall under editorial - non material - changes (e.g. the one about renaming "Conformance clause" section and bringing up the functional definition of conformance targets.). Good job to MQTT editors! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]