[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-510) Improper self reference from Conformance Clause section
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Borgendale updated MQTT-510: -------------------------------- Move the mandatory normative statement about supporting at least one network transport to section 4.2. Reword chapter 7. Done in wd16. > Improper self reference from Conformance Clause section > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MQTT-510 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-510 > Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: edits > Affects Versions: 5, CSD01 > Reporter: Ken Borgendale > Assignee: Ken Borgendale > Priority: Minor > Labels: TAB > Fix For: 5, wd16 > > > TAB-1560 - Jacques Durand (TAB) > CClause should not refer to itself (We read in Section 7: "It satisfies the MUST level requirements in the following chapters …. “Chapter 7 – Conformance”) It should not have to. (recursivity is pretty in code but not in COnf clauses!) Additionally there is no need for any “MUST” in a Clause. That is preferable in order to avoid confusion with regular normative statements in the specification body, a conf clause should be worded more like a rule: “if the <conf target> satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Then it can be claimed conforming according to clause ABC”, or “a <target> that satisfies/follows/fulfill…. Can claim conformance as an <MQTT Server/Client”. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]