[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-collab] Suggestions for moving forward to resolveissues
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 20:26 -0600, monkeyiq wrote: > Also, I've not contributed to the WebODF GCT implementation by Jos van > den Oever. So this makes three independent implementations, not one as > you posit. Thank you for clearing that up. (I have no idea where I got the impression that they weren't truly independent, just that i was under this, apparently false, impression.) > > On your last point, if we try to avoid the GCT because of its ability to > be generic and thus choose ECT and buckets, an application then needs to > be able to generically diff ODF fragments and interpret the results to > actually work out what the changes were in order to show them. We have > merely swept the complexity out of one place and into another. I don't think under the bucket proposal an application is expected to compare the bucket contents to figure out what has changed but the buckets were intended as indivisible units, ie. an application would only indicate that the bucket changed. Andreas
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]