OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
office-comment
18 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [office-comment] Definition of draw:angle in ODF1.2 does not fit to implementation
From
Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> on Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Re: [office-comment] Definition of draw:angle in ODF1.2 does not fit to implementation
From
Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> on Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Missing description of identifier 'pi'
From
Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> on Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
RE: FW: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
RE: FW: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
RE: FW: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
RE: FW: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Re: FW: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on Tue, 7 Aug 2012 07:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
RE: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
FW: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on Sun, 5 Aug 2012 08:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
RE: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on Sat, 4 Aug 2012 22:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
RE: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on Sat, 4 Aug 2012 20:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Re: [office-comment] Definition of draw:angle in ODF1.2 does not fit to implementation
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Re: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Orientation problems with angles
From
Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> on Sat, 4 Aug 2012 14:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Definition of draw:angle in ODF1.2 does not fit to implementation
From
Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> on Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Inconsistency within list of allowed elements for attribut style:background-transparency (ODF 1.2)
From
"Friedrich W. H. Kossebau" <kossebau@kde.org> on Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
2's complement negative and 10 binary digits
From
"efa@iol.it" <efa@iol.it> on Wed, 1 Aug 2012 04:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Mail converted by
MHonArc