[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Deciding on the name
My personal preferences: 1. RELAX++ 2. URELAX 3. iRELAX All the best, Fabio > -----Original Message----- > From: James Clark [mailto:jjc@jclark.com] > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:11 AM > To: Michael Smith; TREX Discussion List > Subject: Re: Deciding on the name > > > There was some degree of consensus at the last telcon to use a > name based on > RELAX ie RELAX something or something RELAX. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Smith" <smith@xml-doc.org> > To: "TREX Discussion List" <trex@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 12:49 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on the name > > > > James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> writes: > > > > > We need to choose a name soon. > > > > I realize we're a little far along for brand-new suggestions, but in > > trying to think of a good short name that connotes the qualities of > > the language well-- a TREX-RELAX mix, a minimalist approach-- I > > thought of a couple I think would work well (in order of preference): > > > > 1. MiX XML Schema > > > > 2. MiXML Schema > > > > In the case of the first, including "XML Schema" in the official name > > may seem redundant, but I still think it's important for it to be > > there (and there are many other abbreviations that are redundant in a > > similar way, so it's not that unusual). Take your pick on pronouncing > > the second: "my XML schema" (like MySQL) or "mix-imal schema". > > > > And a couple more short names: > > > > 3. LuX XML Schema > > > > 4. NuXML Schema > > > > The first in the "let there be light" sense, "fiat lux"-- which would > > make a nice promotional tagline for the language, and one that would > > lend itself to a nice logo. Second of course is "new XML schema" > > > > And I don't think including "XML Schema" or "Schema" in the official > > name would actually make any of the names unwieldy in practice. I'm > > sure that once people are familiar with it, they'll just use the first > > part when refering to it-- i.e. MiX, MiXML, LuX, or NuXML. > > > > > To start the decision making process, please could anybody who cares > > > send a message with the names they find acceptable in order of > > > preference. > > > > > > Here's my list (most preferred first): > > > > > > 1. URELAX (Unified Relax) > > > > > > 2. RELAX NG (Relaxing, RELAX Next Generation) > > > > > > 3. iRELAX (Improved RELAX, ISO RELAX, increment RELAX) > > > > Of those, the one that seems most workable to me is RELAX NG. > > > > --Mike S. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC