[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [relax-ng] Identity constraints
If I recall our earlier discussions on identity constraints correctly (in 2001, pre-1.0), I believe the TC was in agreement an keeping validation and checking of constraints separate. I think having a separate module for identity constraints naturally suggests separate processing or checking. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp] > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:35 AM > To: RELAX NG Mailing List > Subject: Re: [relax-ng] Identity constraints > > > > On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 17:46:59 +0700 > James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > > > I would summarize the desired level of functionality as a bit more > > than what's in XML Schema, but with a strong requirement that it must be > > streamable. > > Probably, the hardest part is agreement on requirements. I am not sure > if we are knowledgeable enough to avoid pre-mature standardization. > > Recent research are concerned about incremental checking of > identity constraints > and consistency-checking between schemas and identity > constraints. These topics > look interesting and valuable. I also think that separation of > validation and > identity-constraint-checking is highly important. Are we going > to cover these > topics (and other topics I'm ignorant of)? > > If we do not standardize anything and let people rely on XQuery > or innovate by > themselves, will we have real problems? (I'm just asking.) > > -- > MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC