[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [relax-ng] Re: [relax-ng-comment] Constraint: RELAX NG namespace uri
Yes, I think this is needed. It's not quite that simple because attributes on annotation elements don't have this restriction. Also a similar restriction is needed on annotation elements. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Rosenborg" <david.rosenborg@pantor.com> To: <relax-ng-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 1:14 AM Subject: [relax-ng-comment] Constraint: RELAX NG namespace uri I guess "Constraint: unqualified name" relates to the following sentence in section 3 of the RELAX NG Specification: "A foreign attribute is an attribute with a name whose namespace URI is neither the empty string nor the RELAX NG namespace URI" So to be consistent, shouldn't the non-terminal prefixedAnnotationAttributes have a constraint saying that the attribute name must not have the RELAX NG namespace URI? Cheers, David
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC