[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [security-services] Issue: conform-spec-11 test cases regardingartifact handling
Emily Xu just posed the following question to me. I suspect the test cases go too far in having these requirements. Is that correct? >According to Test Case 1-2, 1-3, 1-6, 1-10 in the conformance spec 11, a SAML >Request is sent over SOAP protocol binding to a responder. The responder >should >be able to return an assertion artifact in the Response. The requester then >request the assertion using the artifact. > >The key here is an artifact is requested for ANY type of assertion AND >over SOAP >protocol binding. I don't see these requirement anywhere else, not even in >Table >1: Protocol Bindings and Profiles for SAML Assertions. Are they intended or >should be removed? Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC