[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] RE: IBM charter position (was [security-services] Groups- sstc-saml-charter-2.0-draft-02.doc uploaded)
Timo, >Our customers express the same urgency and need for a solution as do RSA's customers. Besides the business related needs, the mobile industry is facing technical challenges introduced by legislation. Thanks for the comments but I'm confused, it seems that OMA has chosen to accept Liberty 1.1 for SSO but complete federated identity is still out of scope for the phase 1 work. So it seem that any immediate urgency from the mobile community can be solved by the specifications the Liberty group has encouraged the OMA to accept., So what is pushing the urgency in the SS-TC, can't folks use the Liberty specifications ? Maybe you can get some of your customers to help us understand why what Liberty group has encouraged the OMA to accept is not sufficient. You are welcome to attend the public workshops on the various WS-* specifications. RSA is joining us next week, and maybe Nokia could participate with the authors and other companies. These workshops allows an open exchange under RF rules prior to submitting the specifications to a standards body. See http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/offers/WS-Specworkshops/ for IP and other related issues. I remember Liberty making a similar commitment to hold such events. Have there been any workshops held under RF terms yet ? I also don't understand the phone number references you make ? I know there is some EU mandate coming but I'm not sure why the SAML group needs to address this, can you elaborate as I have not seen any requirement in the SS-TC or in OMA yet.? Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]