[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Requirements: versioning and corrections
In line with my previous discussion of requirements for versioning for the SET approach to ontological management of contexts for document interoperability how about we write a white paper or position paper to propose a solution if the problem I have suggested does in fact exist. I would propose something along the following lines: As a real example take the latest UBL 2.0 errata 01 specification which among other things caters for an error in the BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA code. Say there is an ontology which includes the old code: when making any inferences using this ontology a reasoner will report a certain value for BOSNIA but not one for BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Now feed the reasoner with an ontology based on the update package (errata) and run the reasoner again. If OWL is used, the original code information cannot just using OWL be eliminated from the inferences. Instead the reasoner will now report still report that BOSNIA has code 'AND' (this is the error) and it may also have a correspondence between BOSNIA and BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA such that it reports two values for BOSNIA - the old, erroneous one and the new, correct one. What I would propose as a solution is that there be a standard to list in order the ontologies by namespaces or other universally unique IDs in the order they have to be entered into a completely clean knowledgebase immediately prior to running the reasoner after which the knowledgebase is either frozen or cleared - when OWL is used. This proposed standard would amount to a kind of reasoner's knowledgebase recipe. It would ensure a certain degree of uniformity across implementations (though reasoners may differ in their inferences perhaps). It would also allow for conformance testing of implementations. One possible recipe language might be a test assertions markup (includes prerequisites, and formal predicates). Does this ring true at all with SET TC experiences with reasoners and knowledgebases with OWL? All the best Steve -- Stephen D. Green Partner SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 Associate Director Document Engineering Services http://www.documentengineeringservices.com http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]